Unseen Text: The Smith Family
Text Type: Charity Appeal – Advertisement
Guiding Question: How do features such as layout, fonts and visuals help support the argument?
Charity appeals are a sub-genre of advertising and, as such, you can easily transfer your learning about advertising techniques – especially persuasive techniques – onto appeals. The topic of a charity appeal could be anything from homelessness, to famine, to refugees from war. As a reader, it’s impossible to believe that you, one individual, can solve crises such as hunger, poverty or sickness. But it’s very easy to believe that you can help a particular individual out of a dire situation. Charity appeals are aware of this, and often introduce you to a victim of suffering, giving you a bit of information about their life and family background, and explaining that the situation they are in is out of their control. In this way, the appeal creates that empathetic connection you need in order to take action. Read the response below, and look how you can use this knowledge as a starting point to develop a persuasive analysis of your own. Once again, a reminder that this is only one of many possible responses to this text. Alternative approaches can be equally valid.
The given text is a charity appeal produced by the Smith Family, an Australian organisation that supports poor children. The values of the organisation are made clear: they believe that education is essential to ‘prevent a lifetime of poverty’, therefore they focus on providing educational materials such as schoolbooks and promoting access to education for children of poor families. The purpose of the text is clearly persuasive; the whole point of this campaign is to persuade the reader to donate money to the Smith Family so large, red ‘Donate Now’ buttons are located in four separate areas of the text, making it easy and simple for a reader to click at any time. The text is designed to appeal to the average Australian reader, a wide audience who may have disposable income to donate to help ‘disadvantaged children in Australia.’
The layout of the text has been designed to be followed from top to bottom. There are several distinct advantages to the argument should the reader follow the text in this way. Firstly, the most prominent image and caption are at the top of the page. ‘Poverty’ is an abstract concept and, as a social issue, is too big for any one individual to solve. Should the appeal be for us to end poverty alone, it is unlikely to convince an average reader to donate. Charity campaigns tend to use metonymy, where a single individual stands in for a wider issue. In this case, it’s Jenny, who is 8 years old, and introduced to us immediately in the image at the top. The reader is made to feel that they can help Jenny and are therefore more likely to donate.
The image presents Jenny surrounded by buildings and other children in school. However, Jenny is isolated in the foreground where the school and other children are out of focus in the background, a technique which suggests she has no way of joining in with their games. Her body language is muted, in contrast to other children who are in a range of active poses, and her facial expression is negative. This reading of the image is anchored by the caption which tells us that ‘it is obvious to her classmates Jenny is poor, and they don’t let her forget it. She has no friends and often feels lonely.’ Loneliness is an emotive issue and the idea of a child being ‘lonely’ and vulnerable is unpleasant. Jenny makes direct eye contact with the reader, as if her only link is with ‘you’. The image and caption are designed to create this connection and therefore increase the chance that the reader will want to help by donating to the appeal.
The text foregrounds its emotional appeal through the use of subheadings, each one containing emotive language or situations which intensify the pathos of Jenny’s situation. The first states ‘being poor hurts. Everyday Jenny struggles in the classroom. She feels isolated and alone.’ Words such as ‘isolated’, ‘alone’, ‘struggle’ and ‘hurts’ are all emotive and intended to make the reader feel sorry for Jenny. The second subheading fleshes out the story of poverty: we learn ‘Jenny’s family have no money.’ Both these subheadings are presented in bold, dark blue font, all the better to catch a quick reader’s attention and encourage him or her to read the associated paragraphs.
Each paragraph adds a little bit more to Jenny’s story, relying almost entirely on pathos to recruit the reader’s sympathy. We discover Jenny’s mother is ‘too ill to work’, and the text repeats ‘with an ill mother’ to drive home the point that poverty is not Jenny’s fault. Readers like to be assured that their money is only going to deserving cases, which is something of a stereotype, but nevertheless effective in this campaign. Jenny’s isolation is reiterated (‘Jenny can’t participate like other children. It means she misses out…’) and the word ‘hurts’ is repeated as well. In reality, the paragraphs of copy don’t alter the basic emotional appeal and don’t give much more information than could be gleaned in the subheadings. Their purpose is to deepen and intensify the emotional connection with Jenny, hopefully ensuring as many people as possible donate to help her cause. But the central appeal of the campaign would be successful even without reading the copy.
The third subheading represents a turning point in the text. Having established the emotional connection, the text now tries to leverage that into action. This third subheading is crucial, so it is presented in a lighter blue font: ‘Children like Jenny urgently need your help. You can change their lives…’ The word ‘urgently’ is an example of kairos, the appeal for swift action, which demonstrates how the text is changing its strategy. From this moment on direct address (‘you’) becomes a feature, in examples such as ‘you can help disadvantaged children’ and ‘it is absolutely crucial that we give them the support that they need.’ The subtle switch from ‘you’to ‘we’ is important. A reader might believe that acting by themselves will make no difference, but by pooling their resources with other generous readers they can help Jenny out of her situation. Modals such as ‘can’ and ‘will’ are strong and positive, creating the impression that the problem can be solved by the reader: ‘you can…’or ‘we can…’ is repeated four times, and at one point highlighted in red.
Towards the end, the text employs some different rhetorical strategies to persuade the reader to donate to this cause. A series of ‘If… then…’ sentences are designed to provoke action on the part of the reader. For example, the sentence ‘By investing in a child’s education, we can break a cycle of disadvantage’ creates a cause-and-effect relationship between the reader’s action and a positive outcome. The sequence of images reflects this pattern. While the first three images present the desperate situation of poverty, the fourth image shows a positive and healthy relationship between a teacher and pupil. The photo has been designed to contrast in colour – washed-out blue represents poverty while this picture contains warm green – and saturation; it is noticeably brighter and warmer in tone. It is important to show the reader that the mission of the Smith Family is achievable in a concrete way.
Finally, the text uses logical appeals to reinforce the suggestion that your donation can make a difference. Phrases like ‘research shows…’ give the claims of the appeal more authority. The outcomes of the Learning for Life programme, funded by donations, are presented in statistical form, and highlighted using coloured circles. Details such as ‘our programs are in every state and territory with outcomes measured and traced’ suggest organisation and effectiveness on the part of The Smith Family; they know what they are doing and your money will not be wasted or misused.
Categories:Paper 1 Analysis