Category: Paper 1 Analysis

On Your Bike

Here is a perfect example of a superb Paper 1 text. The piece relates an interesting experience: a challenging road race for deaf cyclists. Most interesting is the writer’s use of language, and you are pointed in this direction by a fairly typical guiding question. Sometimes dramatic, at other times evocative, often informative, and even a tiny bit persuasive to the right kind of reader, the article can be approached in different ways. Read the extract first, then have a look at the model response which focuses on how the writer conveys a mixture of danger and excitement, and how that contributes to the reader’s impression of not only the Tour, but the writer’s courage and daring as well.

Snow and Ice

The Guardian has proven to be a particularly fertile source of texts for Paper 1 in the past, possibly because their journalism is of a high and reliable standard, and possibly because the articles in both print and online versions range widely across different topics, themes and events. If you’re familiar at all with the Guardian you might be surprised at how dramatic and sensational this article turns out to be. You shouldn’t worry about that – in fact, this could form the basis of a strong analysis, as you’ll see in the sample response that follows.

Behind the Scenes

Gender stereotypes are a popular component of many Lang and Lit courses and is an issue that sometimes surfaces in Paper 1 unseen texts as well. This CNN article contains many of the stereotypes about women that you may have encountered in your classroom study: idealised appearance; sexualisation; trivialisation; the male gaze. Nevertheless, as a textual analysis, you should focus more on the strategies and methods used by the writer to build anticipation for the catwalk show. The article begins with a challenging pun and the analysis below rests partly on an understanding of the double meaning of the word ‘skinny.’

Travel Tales

This is an excellent text to analyse as it’s crammed full of content and ideas. One challenge of this paper is choosing what exactly to write about and focusing your answer on a well-selected range of ideas and devices. As well, this text is wide open to interpretation: some may find it entertaining and humorous, while others may see the depiction of Indonesian ‘strangeness’ challenging. The guiding question asks you to consider both possibilities, and the sample response below tries to balance both readings of the text.

Hausa People

This text is a little bit unusual: it’s an encyclopaedia entry. Whatever text you may encounter, it’s a good idea to consider the source of the information you have been given: does it come from within the given field of knowledge or from outside? This extract is written from an outside perspective, and from that initial observation, a great deal of insight can be gleaned into not only what information we learn, but how it is phrased – and also lets us consider what is not being said. This type of thinking demonstrates evaluation of the text, something that is explicitly called for in the Paper 1 mark scheme (criteria B).

Coffee Time

This text is an excellent example of mix you’ll see often in Paper 1: information is presented in a way that has a persuasive appeal. The writer is trying hard to convince us of Starbuck’s sustainability credentials. It comes across as a very ‘corporate’ text, using technical language and even jargon to drown the reader in evidence. However, the response attempts to balance this evaluation with focused analysis of techniques that are likely to convince the reader, so addressing the given prompt. The response focuses heavily on the stylistic features of language use. A good exercise might be to add your own analysis of some of the formal features of the text: heading/subheading and image are both ripe for analysis. Can you develop the argument even further with attention to these details?