The basis of arguing or debating effectively is using objective evidence to justify opinions, rather than relying on assertions that are based on logical fallacies. Understanding what a logical fallacy is can be an epoch-making event for many students, and identifying them in everyday conversations, the sales pitches of advertising campaigns, and the rhetoric of politicians’ speeches is an immensely empowering skill.
We have, arguably, never before lived in a time when logical fallacies are so prevalent. Entire political campaigns are built on them, in all countries of the world: see Brexit and the election of Donald Trump for two popular examples of campaigns from which you can find – literally – hundreds of logical fallacies.
Read this article – then listen to a speech and enjoy picking apart all the logical fallacies you find inside:
Class Activity: don’t believe what you hear on TV
Watch this clip from a Canadian morning television news show, in which the anchorwoman discusses the spread of coronavirus in the early days of the outbreak with an infectious disease expert. With the benefit of hindsight, it’s clear that some of the things the expert reports are factual and correct, whereas others were opinions that have since been proved fallacious.
What logical and argumentative fallacies can you find in this short report? Did the expert use any persuasive strategies at any point? Identify as many of these as you can and explain them to your classmates.
Visit this archive of Donald Trump speeches, and select one. Present an extract of this speech, up to a maximum of two pages. Annotate the speech to submit as a learner portfolio entry.
Here is an example of a piece of student work based on Donald Trump’s remarks at a campaign event in his 2016 Presidential run. Speaking about John McCain, Trump said “I don’t like losers” (in regards to the 2008 election), said McCain was “not a war hero,” (referring to his tour of duty during the Vietnam war) then said “he’s a war hero because he was captured. I like people that weren’t captured.”
Paper 1 Text Type Focus: satirical texts
At the end of your course you will be asked to analyze unseen texts (1 at Standard Level and 2 at Higher Level) in an examination. You will be given a guiding question that will focus your attention on formal or stylistic elements of the text(s), and help you decode the text(s)’ purpose(s). One of the hardest text types to approach unless you’ve had some prior exposure might be the political, editorial or satirical text. This type of text is fantastic at lampooning some of the more blatant and outrageous logical fallacies that some people – overeager politicians, climate-change deniers, pseudo-intellectuals, wannabe populists – propagate in the mass media. Use these practice texts to familiarise yourself with the different features of satire and add them to your Learner Portfolio; you will want to revise text types thoroughly before your Paper 1 exam. You can find more information – including text type features and sample Paper 1 analysis – by visiting 20/20. Read through one or two of the exemplars, then choose a new paper and have a go at writing your own Paper 1 analysis response:
Key features of satirical texts
- Purpose: satirical or political cartoons aim to satirise, meaning to ridicule, lampoon or criticise a specific target.
- Topical: satirical cartons are up to date and relevant.
- Caricature: people are simplified and exaggerated in ways that draw attention to the writer’s subject matter.
- Symbolism: people, items of clothing and other objects signify wider concepts.
- Irony: a satirical writer might write the exact opposite of what they really think!
- Labelling: often names or captions are superimposed over images to make the target of the satire clear.
- Artistic style: cartoons are drawn purposefully and with intention. Are the pictures crisp, heavy, weighty, light, cartoony, realistic, bright, dark? Can you tell whether the artist used pencil, pen and ink, or brush? Words that describe mood and tone can be useful when analysing style.
- Bias: satire is often one sided and subjective, representing the opinion of the cartoonist.
Body of Work: editorial cartoons by Ann Telnaes
Ann Telnaes creates editorial cartoons in various mediums – animation, visual essays, live sketches, and traditional print – for the Washington Post. She won the Pulitzer Prize in 2001 for her print cartoons and the National Cartoonists Society’s Reuben for Outstanding Cartoonist of the Year in 2017. She attended California Institute of the Arts, specializing in character animation. Before beginning her career as an editorial cartoonist, Telnaes worked for several years as a designer for Walt Disney Imagineering. She has also animated and designed for various studios in Los Angeles, New York, London, and Taiwan.
Telnaes’ first book, Humor’s Edge, was published by Pomegranate Press and the Library of Congress in 2004. Here is a small selection of cartoons taken from Humor’s Edge, all drawn between 1996 and 2003. To explore more of Telnaes’ work, including her contributions to Six Chic, a contemporary magazine exploring feminist points of view, you can visit her website, or search through the links below. Together, these cartoons constitute a Body of Work:
- Ann Telnaes’ website
- Humor’s Edge: Put It On Your Tab
- Humor’s Edge: The World According to W
- Six Chic: Happily Ever After?
- Editorial Cartoonist with Feminist Bite – an interview with NPR (podcast)
- A Conversation with Ann Talnaes (video interview)
Towards Assessment: Individual Oral
“Supported by an extract from one non-literary text and one from a literary work, students will offer a prepared response of 10 minutes, followed by 5 minutes of questions by the teacher, to the following prompt: Examine the ways in which the global issue of your choice is presented through the content and form of two of the texts that you have studied. (40 marks)“
Please find suggestions here; but always be mindful of your own ideas and class discussions and follow the direction of your own programme of study when devising your assessment tasks.
A small selection of Ann’s editorial cartoons would be an ideal text to talk about in this assessed activity. The named author would be ‘Ann Telnaes’ and you can consider her work in light of the Field of Inquiry: Politics, Power and Justice. A pertinent Global Issue might be ‘Language and Literature as agents of change’. Texts are powerful components of culture, and are integral in challenging social norms. In the case of Ann Telnaes’ cartoons, texts can provoke discussion which may – one day – result in social and political change. You could pair her work with any literary text that has a political or social purpose. Speak with your teacher about ideas for pairing texts, or use the suggestions below as a starting point:
- Broken April by Ismail Kadare – targeting the anachronistic customary law known as the Kanun, Kadare’s novel can be read as a political statement, illuminating the injustices of life for people on the Albanian high plateau.
- Pygmalion by George Bernard Shaw – this play is a social satire and, in particular, Shaw skewers the emptiness of upper calss culture. You might like to look at the presentation of the upper classes in Act 3 as a good companion piece to Telnaes’ cartoon.
- Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice – according to the conventions of the time, Jewish characters were expected to be villains. But a closer look at the behaviour of the Christian characters might reveal the true targets of Shakespeare’s cutting play. You might like to examine, for example, Bassanio’s ridiculous plan to recoup his losses in Act 1 Scene 1.
- The World’s Wife by Carol Ann Duffy – a strong pairing. Where Telnaes creates cartoons, Duffy writes poetry to provoke discussion about women in society, a discussion which may lead to social change.
Wider Reading and Research
If you are interested in the topics and articles on this page, you might like to conduct some wider reading and research. Here are some recommendations to get you started:
- Kaltoons – satirical artist Kal Kallaugher caricatures world leaders from Osama to Obama.
- A Free World Needs Satire – political cartoonist Patrick Chapatte argues the necessity of satire.
- A Cultural History of Satirical Cartoons – follow the links inside this article to find out more about ‘these instruments of tremendous editorial power.’
- Gocomics – you can find updated cartoons from many of today’s foremost editorial and political cartoonists by browsing this comprehensive site. Great for practicing your skills.
- Editorial Cartoons and Social Justice – you can follow this sequence of lessons from the Learning for Social Justice website, each one featuring a cartoon exploring a social theme such as tolerance, language diversity and so on.